Comparison between 2018 and 2019
The following table depicts the 2019 results with the help of three indices. The year 2018 is represented by the figure 100. The volume index describes the change in the volume, correspondingly the price index reflects the price development and the value index depicts the change in the current-price value of the item in question. Only the items with the largest value are shown in the table; complete data can be found in the database tables appended to the statistics. For example, the volume of cereal production grew 1.24-fold (i.e. 24% growth) compared to the year before. The price, in turn, grew 1.09-fold and the output at current prices is expected to be 1.35-fold that of the previous year.
Economic Accounts for Agriculture, preliminary data 2019
Value 2018 M€ | Volume index | Price index | Value index | Value 2019 M€ | |
01 Cereals (including seeds) | 443 | 124 | 109 | 135 | 598 |
02 Industrial crops | 56 | 95 | 100 | 95 | 53 |
03 Forage plants | 235 | 127 | 110 | 140 | 329 |
04 Vegetables and horticultural products | 512 | 99 | 90 | 89 | 454 |
05 Potatoes (including seeds) | 74 | 99 | 105 | 104 | 77 |
06 Fruits | 120 | 97 | 97 | 94 | 113 |
09 Other crop products | 13 | 137 | 96 | 131 | 17 |
10 Crop output | 1 452 | 111 | 102 | 113 | 1 640 |
11 Animals | 885 | 103 | 103 | 106 | 935 |
11.1 Cattle | 412 | 104 | 101 | 105 | 433 |
11.2 Pigs | 257 | 104 | 104 | 108 | 277 |
11.5 Poultry | 183 | 100 | 105 | 105 | 192 |
12 Animal products | 1 388 | 96 | 98 | 95 | 1 318 |
12.1 Milk | 1 094 | 100 | 98 | 98 | 1 070 |
12.2 Eggs | 78 | 102 | 102 | 104 | 81 |
12.9 Other animal products total | 216 | 78 | 99 | 77 | 166 |
13 Animal output | 2 273 | 99 | 100 | 99 | 2 252 |
14 Agricultural goods output | 3 725 | 104 | 101 | 105 | 3 892 |
15 Agricultural services output | 146 | 96 | 103 | 98 | 144 |
16 Agricultural output (14+15) | 3 872 | 103 | 101 | 104 | 4 036 |
17 Secondary activities (inseparable) | 544 | 96 | 103 | 98 | 535 |
18 Output of the agricultural 'industry' | 4 416 | 102 | 101 | 104 | 4 571 |
19 Total intermediate consumption | 3 302 | 97 | 104 | 100 | 3 297 |
19.0.2 Energy lubricants | 454 | 90 | 102 | 92 | 417 |
19.0.3 Fertilisers and soil improvers | 284 | 98 | 103 | 100 | 285 |
19.0.6 Feedingstuffs (intermediate consumption) | 1 018 | 97 | 106 | 103 | 1 051 |
19.0.9 Agricultural services (intermediate consumption) | 325 | 99 | 101 | 100 | 324 |
20 Gross value added at basic prices | 1 114 | 120 | 95 | 114 | 1 274 |
21 Fixed capital consumption | 1 198 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 200 |
22 Net value added at basic prices | -84 | .. | .. | .. | 74 |
23 Compensation of employees | 322 | .. | .. | 102 | 328 |
24 Other taxes on production | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. |
25 Other subsidies on production | 1 549 | .. | .. | 100 | 1 548 |
26 Factor income | 1 465 | .. | .. | 111 | 1 622 |
27 Operating surplus/mixed income | 1 143 | .. | .. | 113 | 1 294 |
28 Rents and other real estate rental charges to be paid | 225 | .. | .. | 101 | 228 |
29 Interest paid | 89 | .. | .. | 101 | 90 |
31 Entrepreneurial income | 829 | .. | .. | 118 | 976 |
40 Total agricultural labour input | 60 | .. | .. | 98 | 59 |
Technical crops refer primarily to oil plants, sugar beet and protein crops. The oil crop harvest was weak but the better harvest from peas, broad beans, sugar beets and cumin compensated for the weak turnip rape and rapeseed harvests. As a result, the volume of technical plants decreased only by some five per cent from 2018.
The good green fodder harvest also boosts the value of plant production. On the other hand, green fodder is used as intermediate products for livestock, so it also increases the imputed intermediate product costs of the industry. Of course, a good fodder harvest also affects the expected result from cattle farms; one does not necessarily have to acquire as much commercial fodder if own fodder is available.
The prices of vegetables and other garden products have been lower than last year, so the value of output in horticulture is expected to decrease by good 10 per cent.
The volume and prices of conventional livestock production are expected to remain at last year’s level or even to grow slightly. Only the volume of fur production is expected contract considerably from 2018, which will lower the volume of total livestock production slightly.
The volume and value data of intermediate consumption are at this time of year still extremely preliminary so they must usually be revised when new data become available. The volume is, however, estimated to decreased somewhat while prices are expected to grow slightly. Fodder costs correspond with nearly one-third of the total value of intermediate consumption. Good 40 per cent of fodder costs is generated from fodder produced at the own farm.
Gross value added is obtained by deducting intermediate consumption from output. The volume will grow by some 20 per cent in 2019 compared to 2018 but due to changes in the prices of output and intermediate consumption the current-priced gross value added will only increase by 14 per cent. When consumption of fixed capital, i.e. depreciations, are subtracted from gross value added net value added is obtained. The net value added at current prices seems to turn positive after four negative years.
Entrepreneurial income from agriculture* is derived when other subsidies on production are added to and salaries paid, rents paid on land and interest paid are subtracted from the net value added. Other subsidies on production refer to subsidies that cannot be directly linked to a particular product. The total sum of such subsidies was around EUR 1,550 million in 2019, while the amount of so-called subsidies on products was some EUR 350 million. Entrepreneurial income from agriculture is expected to grow by some 18 per cent from 2018 to close on EUR one billion. However, the value of entrepreneurial income was good EUR 1.5 billion in 2010 so it will still be some one-third lower than 10 years ago. In any case, entrepreneurial income seems to be at its highest in five years.
Source: Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA), Statistics Finland
Inquiries: Hannu Maliniemi 029 551 2796, maataloustilastot@stat.fi
Director in charge: Ville Vertanen
Updated 5.12.2019
Official Statistics of Finland (OSF):
Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA) [e-publication].
ISSN=2670-1006. 2019,
Comparison between 2018 and 2019
. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [referred: 26.11.2024].
Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/eaa/2019/eaa_2019_2019-12-05_kat_001_en.html